Logistics of an advanced therapy medicinal product during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: successful delivery of mesenchymal stromal cells in dry ice.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian hospitals faced the most daunting challenges of their recent history, and only essential therapeutic interventions were feasible. From March to April 2020, the Laboratory of Advanced Cellular Therapies (Vicenza, Italy) received requests to treat a patient with severe COVID-19 and a patient with acute graft-versus-host disease with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs). Access to clinics was restricted due to the risk of contagion. Transport of UC-MSCs in liquid nitrogen was unmanageable, leaving shipment in dry ice as the only option. METHODS: We assessed effects of the transition from liquid nitrogen to dry ice on cell viability; apoptosis; phenotype; proliferation; immunomodulation; and clonogenesis; and validated dry ice-based transport of UC-MSCs to clinics. RESULTS: Our results showed no differences in cell functionality related to the two storage conditions, and demonstrated the preservation of immunomodulatory and clonogenic potentials in dry ice. UC-MSCs were successfully delivered to points-of-care, enabling favourable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This experience underscores the flexibility of a public cell factory in its adaptation of the logistics of an advanced therapy medicinal product during a public health crisis. Alternative supply chains should be evaluated for other cell products to guarantee delivery during catastrophes.

Rejection of hemolyzed samples can jeopardize patient safety.

INTRODUCTION: In vitro hemolysis is the primary cause of sample/test rejection by the laboratory. CASE REPORT: A 10-year-old, admitted with an asthma attack in the emergency-room, medicated with albuterol sulphate (intravenous bronchodilator that could induce hypokalemia), needed laboratory test monitoring. The physician prescribed the technical-nurse to perform blood sampling for: complete blood count, electrolytes, glucose, and blood gas analysis-within 30min after therapy. Samples were delivered to laboratory with a note "I had difficult to locate an appropriate access to perform the blood collection". LABORATORY RESULTS: Glucose: 4.77 mmol/L. Complete blood count revealed discreet eosinophilia 0.13x109/L, and thrombocytopenia 18x109/L. However, platelet clumps were observed in peripheral blood smear. Blood gas analysis was unreported, laboratory informed that sample had micro clots.Electrolytes: laboratory did not report the results; sample hemolyzed. 0.9 g/L of free hemoglobin is the cut-off defined by the laboratory; the sample presented 2.3 g/L of free hemoglobin. 3.9 mmol/L of potassium was the unreported result vs 2.1 mmol/L in the new sample.Briefly, the laboratory technician was trained to hide potassium results on hemolyzed sample due to the potential overestimation. Even if the hemolyzed sample presented a potassium value close to the lower reference range value (3.5-5.1 mmol/L), reporting the potassium result could allow the physician starting proper therapy to revert the hypokalemia by albuterol sulfate. CONCLUSION: The laboratory should be aware of the clinical patient conditions and of the related physician needs, before hiding results. Therefore, both the laboratory and the clinic personnel should communicate in order to guarantee the patient safety.